How am I heralding? (continued)

I herald in writing. I receive the questions, and then go into an altered state of consciousness wherein I contract and then expand into other dimensions. Guided by the questions, I receive an abundance of information, which I receive in one shot and then unfold and translate into written English. I receive this information in an abstract conceptual format and translate it while in that altered state of consciousness. However open I may be, it still goes through my filters, and thus, if SHET communicated through others, the information would be something different, because it would go through their filters and the result would be something else. Thus, the written words are the result of both the information I receive and their translation from their abstract form into the spoken language. That is, this information is not entirely objective. In this manner, the SHET you see is what is reflected through my filters. I do my best to objectively relay information, but in his words, "Objectivity is the sum of subjective viewpoints".

The SHET you see through my heralding is the only SHET, because the fact that I am heralding him creates him, at least in the "tangible" sense. "The herald does have a role: her background allows for the kind of information that occurs. The probability of which kind of information can be provided decides the direction of the information and its unfoldment. It allows for its consistency or the lack of it."

SHET does not provide information as an external source. There is no ready-made definite knowledge waiting to be picked up. Perhaps, it would be easier to understand SHET as an interactive cosmic library. The infinite numbers of books in this library are all empty, mere blank pages. I do not find knowledge that is already there, but rather, I bring the knowledge forth by focusing, my focus being the factor of stabilization, a partial definition of all the probabilities within the blank pages. This means that the knowledge is there in an indefinite form, which is no knowledge. Interaction with this infinite and indefinite knowledge means defining, and thereby, actually creating it. As has been shown, definition creates. Consequently, the kind of information I receive from SHET is precisely what it is because I herald it. Although I plug into SHET to gain information, the result is what comes through my focused self in physical reality, which with all the openness and flexibility is still a self, describable in certain ways and not in others. Consequently, no one can channel SHET, but everybody can connect to his or her own core of knowledge. One cannot change his or her life by aping me, only by learning Holophany. By changing the way we think, the way we see things, we can create a different reality.

Although, in a sense, I create SHET, he himself evolves when I evolve. He described this as follows: "If you look at the language, you will see that in the beginning, when Rha (SHET refers to me as Rha, not Clara) was a baby herald, the language was much more complicated than in later sessions. That should give you a clue. Yes, I am and I am not the same as I was when I first spoke to Rha. It was a face of mine nearer to Rha then that taught her to reach me in my full face of ADAM KADMON. Differentiation, fragmentation, for me is focus."

With my state of mind, the questions and my background, I create a framework that triggers the infinite potential to yield information by interacting with that amorphous field. This interaction occurs when I focus, which stabilizes a certain probability from within the infinite possibilities. My focus is partial definition. My interaction with SHET creates not only him but also a different me after each session.


The exodus from the slavery of our own minds


Previous                    Next

| altered state || consciousness || SHET |
  Sign up for our newsletter
* Name: * Email:
[ Home | Faq | Gallery | Contact | Links ]

© 2009 Clara Szalai. All Rights Reserved